Assistants grounded in content
Conversational assistants that answer from our educational content, framed by the learner’s level and curriculum.
We use language models where they cut real effort — understanding a question, producing an exercise, correcting a mistake — and we decline decorative uses.
What we operate
Conversational assistants that answer from our educational content, framed by the learner’s level and curriculum.
An internal foundation to define, version, evaluate and run agents: one framework for every team, rather than scattered integrations.
Progress, mistakes and time spent feed spaced repetition and the selection of the next exercises.
Assistance with writing and reviewing content, and automated detection of defects in applications before release.
Our principles
No educational content is published without human review. A grade or a correction produced automatically remains a proposal.
Assistants rely on our verified content and state their limits rather than inventing a plausible answer.
Learner data is not used to train third-party models. Processing is documented in our privacy policy.
A use is generalised only if it improves an observable outcome: understanding, success, time saved.
We help our partners separate a genuine gain from an announcement effect.